They believe that logic is part of the process by which the patriarchal institutions of the West continue to dominate and to justify their dominance. original source: https://youtu.be/7XtEZvLo-Sc?t=9m24sPsychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson expresses his frustration with atheists like Sam Harris. That's the logos. Given the tenor of the piece … Juni 1962 in Edmonton[1]) ist ein kanadischer klinischer Psychologe, Autor, Vortragsreisender und Influencer in sozialen Netzwerken. The irony is he attributes "social psychology" to the left (a fucking strawman) but nearly everything that's ever come out of his mouth has been pseudoscientific social psychology. That's weird, considering he was talking about this stuff before Hicks had published the book you're talking about. The article claims that Peterson fails to take account of research … The daughter of renowned Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson has published a photo of herself in a swimsuit on Twitter, sarcastically singling out “scurvy and vitamin deficiencies”. My younger brother idolizes him, but I'm skeptical that Peterson is more than a charlatan. The answer is everything, he really has no understanding whatsoever about Marxism and postmodern theories. They are ungrateful because they live in the greatest society ever, yet still point out problems with this society. Yet Peterson's terms are so blurry here, he seems to suggest that if we call attention to any roles, races, genders, or identities, the individual disappears. Cookies help us deliver our Services. (Photo by Chris Williamson/Getty Images) Getty Images. They believe that that notion is part of the philosophical substructure and practices of the dominant culture. The only thing interesting about the Jordan Peterson phenomenon is that is shows that bubbling beneath the anti-intellectualism of the far right, there's a craving to have academics they can call their own. /r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. How could Peterson have made a blunder of this magnitude? Finally, I am the author … So Matthew Mcconaughey is on Jordan Peterson's podcast... Thread starter Khanimus; Start date Jan 11, 2021; Forums. Jordan Peterson. I mean, he's a bit of a creative confabulator so I'll give him back, but when you peel back the fustian you just get another wannabe celebrity and right wing reactionary blowhard who really, really resents women. The leaps you have to go through from "phallogocentric" to a hatred of dialogue I think reveals this as nothing more than a sad political rant. It's worth pointing out that, by his own logic, Peterson is pointing out a problem in the greatest society ever (postmoderns), which makes him either bitter, ungrateful, or resentful towards postmoderns. containing the works of Russell and Popper. What does that even mean? I'd say the cult of science and logictm are also to blame. First, whereas Hicks' rejection of postmodernism is [meant to be] supported by summaries of its key figures, the book is surprisingly 'light' on exposition... [and such] cursory summaries do the history of thought and its students a serious injustice. By Brian Feldman. Nearly everything that comes out of psychologist mouths is pseudoscientific social psychology, when it's not it's when they aren't speaking as psychologists. Jordan Peterson “12 Rules for Life” author and clinical psychologist Jordan B. Peterson discusses free speech with YouTube’s Dave Rubin, Jan. 1, 2019. The ideas in his book aren't even original. Prev. If Jordan Peterson or Henry Kissinger submitted an essay, it would be rejected. Instead, these threads merely say just that: that Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about. Please keep in mind that: This subreddit is meant for expert assistance, not for debate, and hosts discussion only insofar as its useful for clarifying the state of expert opinion; and. The root word of dialogue is logos -- again, they don't believe that people of good will can come to consensus through the exchange of ideas. The problem is that a reader has no basis in Hicks' text itself to assess those interpretations. So I looked at the relevant threads on r/askphilosophy, but I don't think they really provide reasons to believe that Peterson doesn't know what he's talking about. McConaughey isn't the sharpest though so this isn't surprising really. His training is not in philosophy, though he might well have taken a class here or there. So he doesn't explain why he's bringing up the black community, but I assume he's attempting to insinuate that black people are ungrateful and/or resentful because they are, according to his unbacked and unsourced claim, the 18th wealthiest community on the planet. It's a double edged sword. Created Jul 13, 2014. Letters to Dr. Jordan Peterson. They should at least read the history of "How I can ignore anything on the continent and be a snub?" They don't believe in dialogue. Photo: Chris Williamson/Getty Images. Oct 25, 2017 5,350 London. If they really knew what it was about, they would be more terrified. Jordan Peterson barked the question at us through a perma-squint, like a character in a Western. It's not really an emotion, just a bold accusation or insinuation about postmoderns willfully intending to deceive their readers. Peterson refused to follow Canada’s C-16 bill, which established law regarding gender identity and preference. Mikhaila Peterson, the daughter of psychology guru and writer Jordan Peterson, slammed a newly-published Sunday Times article as “the most insensitive piece of journalism” she has ever experienced.. edited 1 year ago. Born and raised in Alberta, Peterson obtained bachelor's degrees in political science and psychology … Moreover, Western civilization does not do much to devalue the work of scientists or historians in favor of that of philosophers. Or does he have a book or something about it? Member. Dr. Peterson is a best-selling author, professor, and clinical psychologist. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Thanks for sharing that interview and for the write-up. Posted by. This emotion, Peterson says, shows there to be something psychologically wrong with the person. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the askphilosophy community. Since nowhere have poststructuralist thinkers talked about being ungracious (except perhaps maybe in a place where Derrida reflects upon the cultural practice of saying "thank you," but this isn't what he's talking about), he's not engaging in a criticism with them on the level of rational discourse, but claiming that their discourse is actually just a manifestation of a hidden emotion. Shenan Boquet Bishops need to ‘correct’ pro-abortion Biden for ‘acting… But only if it confirms pre existing notions. Peterson does this sort of thing a lot. Es ist ein Selbsthilfebuch des kanadischen klinischen Psychologen und Psychologieprofessors Jordan Peterson. If we dial back the reverence, it will be easier to keep the body of work for it's own merits instead of the (newly fallen) celebrity/persona behind it. There is an evil triad for you. Floating a new thesis now. 138. original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXZSeiAl4PI Psychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson gives his opinion on men going their own way. Recent Podcasts. If postmodernism is in fact untenable, which it very well might be, Stephen Hicks has unfortunately not demonstrated that. JORDAN B PETERSON PODCAST. The Hicks-Peterson account of the relevant philosophical developments is that (i) postmodernism starts with Rousseau and Kant, (ii) who are irrationalists, and (iii) it becomes popular among socialists, (iv) because socialism is inconsistent with being reasonable and so socialists are obliged to reject reason. Jan 11, 2021 #101 Patriiick said: Whenever I read about something dumb Matthew Mcconaughey does or says I have to … So the first thing that you might want to know about Postmodernism is that it doesn't have a shred of gratitude. Go. These videos are derived from his lectures, interviews, and self-uploaded videos. The “brusque dad” shtick is very much a part of his appeal. He doesn't say why he's adding "deceit" to the list. But I would put Jordan Peterson above anyone else when it comes to debating. The black community in the United States is the 18th wealthiest community -- the 18th wealthiest nation on the planet. YOUTUBE CHANNEL. We are talking about what he say. But there's no attempt to engage the mainstream scholarship to show where it errs, nor are these positions developed through a sustained engagement with the primary sources. Jordan Peterson is a clinical psychologist from Canada. More at 10. The irony here is that, with the advent of big science and diminishing returns of research, mass collaboration is becoming more common in science by necessity. Derrida's complaining about this and pointing out the fact that it's connected with a sexist bias towards equating the masculine with the reasonable or the primary. I t has now been just over two years since the first, now-renowned debate between Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson, having taken place on June 23, 2018. Press J to jump to the feed. Jordan Peterson VS Cathy Newman. That’s just called lying. However, I can't seem to actually find anything Jordan Peterson has published on either Postmodernism or philosophy. Would Maps of Meaning have been able to be published in anything like its current form if JP had been forced to have a co-author? (Photo by Chris Williamson/Getty Images) Getty Images. Here's a helpful article on why he is misinforming people about legislation relating to trans people and "gender pronouns". Why would you rewrite history? They believe that logic is part of the process by which the patriarchal institutions of the West continue to dominate and to justify their dominance. They believe that that notion is part of the philosophical substructure and practices of the dominant culture. It's hard to imagine this being a simple misunderstanding since the word civilization doesn't appear in the essay called Tympan a single time. It's not hard to get at what he's trying to insinuate. The Jordan B Peterson Podcast (archive below) features audio versions of some of the most popular and compelling of Dr. Peterson’s YouTube videos, interviews with some of the world’s most compelling thinkers (Camille Paglia, Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt, Sam Harris, General Stanley McChrystal, Iain McGilchrist, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, among many others), lectures … Any science supporting multiple genders or pointing out that video game addiction is real is the enemy. In either case, he's psychologically unstable, by his own diagnosis. Jordan Peterson barked the question at us through a perma-squint, like a character in a Western. It is an important political economic issue, and it is very difficult to deal with. I've seen him misquote, misinterpreted basic explanations of Derrida or Foucoult which would be better read by a first year philosophy student. I mean if it's Malcolm Gladwell books then, yeah, throw that baby out with the bathwater please. Leaving aside the question of whether anything Peterson says about these emotions is sound, notice that he quickly avoids talking about postmodernism. No one thinks that, and Peterson is stacking his cards. The chilling evidence that Jordan Peterson was right: transgender ideology is ‘totalitarian’ Opinion By Fr. It's not like any given person is absolutely possessed by the spirit of postmodernism, because often they're not educated enough to know all the details about what it is that has them in their grip. Logo is logos. After going through the transcript, it seems like he's simply not rigorous and doesn't operate with good faith: So here's what the postmodernists believe: They don't believe in the individual. Hicks' Explaining Postmodernism is a polemic in primer's clothing. His recent sold-out lectures in London had the atmosphere of revival meetings. Imho they follow a cycle, you have the initial wave that creates supporters; then you have the skeptics that are attracted by such illogical demagoguery, but "the wave" is way bigger compared to them so it keeps growing, then you have the skeptical finally getting noticed more and then the cult starts to deflate. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. … There may be a day when we learn there was a dark side to Marie Curie or Helen Keller. RECOMMENDED BOOKS. He's a psychologist. The days of Renaissance men revolutionizing multiple fields from their armchairs are over. Every single one of these claims is astonishing, and at odds with mainstream scholarship. My younger brother idolizes him, but I'm skeptical that Peterson is more than a charlatan. can be "really justified". Non-subscribers who wish to read it can sign up for two free articles a week here. So it has to be either malice or profound ignorance. So since this comes up so much, I was going to try to find some articles by him. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the enoughpetersonspam community, Continue browsing in r/enoughpetersonspam, Press J to jump to the feed. But the Hicks-Peterson account, as you describe it, sounds like some conspiracy theory level stuff! Instead of disproving postmodernism, Hicks dismisses it; instead of taking postmodernism seriously and analyzing it carefully on its terms, Hicks oversimplifies and trivializes it, seemingly in order to justify his own prejudice against postmodernism. /u/quicksort17 /u/DSE96 /u/drunkentune /u/spudster999 /u/PepperJohn /u/Zenarchist /u/wokeupabug /u/Coltorl /u/v12wannabe /u/cookieslemons /u/im_not_afraid. S4 E6: Gad Saad: Infectious Ideas February 16th, 2021 | This episode was recorded … Seit 1997 lehrt er Psychologie an der University of Toronto, seine Hauptforschungsgebiete sind die Psychologie des religiösen und ideologischen Glaubens sowie die Verbesserung der Persönlichkeit und Leistung. PERSONALITY COURSE. Hence, white privilege. What a postmodern thing to say! So I … I t has now been just over two years since the first, now-renowned debate between Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson, having taken place on June 23, 2018. heroes in journey . This forum is dedicated to the work associated with Dr. Jordan Peterson: a public intellectual, clinical psychologist, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. 245k. He began to receive widespread attention in the late 2010s for his views on cultural and political issues. Huge exaggeration, but the gist of his argument is that when we say that someone got preferential treatment from a cop "because they were white" (or the reverse, but Peterson indicates he's thinking about whites), we aren't treating them as individuals, but as "exemplar of a race." original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXZSeiAl4PI Psychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson gives his opinion on men going their own way. I have two reservations about this text. 143 votes, 47 comments. … It’s genuinely tragic what happened to Jordan Peterson. Helen Keller was a Nazi informant. They just want to be validated in their intellectual indolence. He knows how to manipulate people. He was a fixture on TVO (Ontario’s publicly funded station) in the late 2000s and on; as an essayist, as a commentator, as a guest. I don't get the appeal of personality cults. Member. How could Peterson have made a blunder of this magnitude? After all, interpretations need as much defense as arguments in order to be convincing. The anti–Jordan Peterson subreddit r/enoughpetersonspam is my favorite place to waste time. Discussion . Okay, they don't believe in logic. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. And the arrogance which he talks with is so mind boggling I really start to think he's one of the most anti intellectual public figures around. So the reason they don't let people who they don't agree with speak on campus, is because they don't agree with letting people speak. Where can I find his articles about postmodernism? I wonder which one it is. exMage. Opinion The chilling evidence that Jordan Peterson was right: transgender ideology is ‘totalitarian’ With every passing day, more and more stories … Please do … An article published in 2020 in the International Journal of Jungian Studies, ′Carl Jung, John Layard and Jordan Peterson: Assessing Theories of Human Social Evolution and Their Implications for Analytical Psychology', offers a sustained critique of Peterson's thought as outlined in 12 Rules for Life. I cannot think of any politician, thinker or novelist who has sent so much comfort and aspiration to so many people . Mikhaila Peterson’s tweet came after her father , who like Mikhaila subsists on an entirely all-beef diet, asked her “to explain it a bit” referring to an article in the Atlantic Monthly . So there's not really much scholarly work to do here, beyond objecting to the quality of this kind of scholarship and pointing people to mainstream scholarship on these issues--as Lorkovic says, the crucial problem is that there isn't the kind of scholarly work backing up these theses, that is needed for a sustained and critical appraisal of them. Good thing to keep in mind when humanities students get all smug about how science doesn't teach critical thinking. Such intense adoration can turn nasty. The remark was made on her father’s Instagram page, as the Canadian professor published an unedited audio recording of the interview he and Mikhaila held with The Sunday … There's a general science of thought or being or whatever that has to be understood before the natural sciences, history, etc. 12 Rules For Life: Ordnung und Struktur in einer chaotischen Welt (englischer Originaltitel: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos) ist der deutsche Titel eines 2018 erschienenen englischsprachigen Bestsellers. Peterson like Newt Gingrich (the stupid person's genius) is the ignorant person's intellectual. Accepting that there are different facets to a person's character, behaviour and contributions to culture/human knowledge will be crucial as we rewrite history. That is, if blacks ask to be on equal footing with whites, they are ungrateful, when they should be appreciating the fact that they have it better than people in some random other place. Now that I looked up to it, it seems that Hicks and Petersons are fond of Ayn Rand, which might explain their negativeness towards Kant. I don't know anything about any of these fields, so citations and reading suggestions would also be very appreciated. And if you're bitter about everything that's happening around you, despite the fact that you're bathed in wealth, than there is something absolutely wrong with you. We have already seen a few power debate techniques and we have already done a debate analysis in the the Trump VS Clinton debate. He puts things imprecisely and sometimes downright wrong - his interpretation of Heidegger in the Introduction to 12 Rules , for example, is highly contentious and I can't imagine many Heidegger scholars would recognises … I had expected them to be making a bad version of something like the argument that Descartes' and Kant's turn to the subject leads to Nietzsche inverting morality and making all values subjective and bringing about relativism, thus requiring us to make a return to premodern values (an argument I have heard ancient and Thomistic thinkers make, one that I think comes from some of Heidegger's more conservative students, maybe Strauss; I'm not sure). Oct 25, 2017 10,506 Detroit, MI. S4 E5: Mark Manson and Jordan and Mikhaila Peterson Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-17T10:18:20-05:00 February 11th, 2021 | Mikhaila Peterson co-hosts this episode. In fact, a search for "Hicks Ayn Rand" shows an interview with Hicks with Randists that alleges post-modern attack on Rand. For a sentiment like those already expressed here, but in the literature, here's Lorkovic's assessment of Hicks' thesis in Philosophy in Review 25(4): Stephen R.C. EtcetEra Forum. UNDERSTANDMYSELF.COM. On postmodernism, apparently Peterson is getting his account of it from Hicks' Explaining Postmodernism. Jordan Peterson is polarising because he is a psychologist who often opines on fields outside of his own expertise, including philosophy. In 2013, Jordan Peterson told me about Quora so I joined and Peterson was the first person I followed. At the time, I was only vaguely aware of Sam Harris and was not overly … Archived *Why* are Jordan Peterson's philosophical opinions wrong? Jordan Bernt Peterson (geboren am 12. On the other hand, the humanities is most invested in the Great Man model. Thanks for pointing that out, Peterson. No. Renaissance men did what they did because the vast majority of people were wage slaves and didn't have the interest in reading. Remember, Western culture is Phallogocentric. 1; 2; 3; First Prev 3 of 3 Go to page. The topic of Tympan is the tendency for philosophical systems (like that of Hegel, or Heidegger) to consider philosophy as dominant over all other forms of inquiry. The root word of dialogue is logos -- again, they don't believe that people of good will can come to consensus through the exchange of ideas. This allows him to say that no one can point out an existing problem in society, because any such act of pointing out is a manifestation of a hidden emotion. If there are problems in the black community, if anyone complains about them or draws attention to them, they are ungrateful and resentful. Dr. Jordan Peterson 2021-02-01T21:56:28-05:00 I was recently the subject of a Sunday Times cover story written by Decca Aitkenson. We already talked about how stupid what he's saying is, but notice that Peterson doesn't believe in logic either, as he has dismissed any surface level content (e.g.